• SKIP TO CONTENT
  • SKIP NAVIGATION
  • Patient Resources
    • COVID-19 Patient Resource Center
    • Clinical Trial Listings
    • What is Clinical Research?
    • Volunteering for a Clinical Trial
    • Understanding Informed Consent
    • Useful Resources
    • FDA Approved Drugs
  • Professional Resources
    • Research Center Profiles
    • Market Research
    • FDA Approved Drugs
    • Training Guides
    • Books
    • eLearning
    • Events
    • Newsletters
    • White Papers
    • SOPs
    • eCFR and Guidances
  • White Papers
  • Clinical Trial Listings
  • Advertise
  • COVID-19
  • Sign In
  • Create Account
  • Sign Out
  • My Account
Home » Randomized Trials Needed to Evaluate PI3K Drugs Before Approval Submissions

Randomized Trials Needed to Evaluate PI3K Drugs Before Approval Submissions

April 25, 2022

Makers of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) inhibitors in blood cancers should be required to complete randomized phase 3 trials with active comparators before they submit applications for approval, an FDA advisory committee says.

The nearly unanimous vote (16 for and one abstaining) of the Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee is in response to what committee members called a trend that’s “unprecedented in oncology” of high levels of toxicity and low rates of overall survival across one drug class.

Most of the four FDA-approved PI3K inhibitors used the agency’s accelerated approval pathway, which only requires a single-arm trial. Subsequent randomized phase 3 trials of the PI3K inhibitor class showed troubling toxicities, inadequate dose optimization and trial design considerations regarding the limitations of single-arm trials, as well as low overall survival rates.

Members were in agreement that randomized trials made sense for this potentially dangerous class of drugs that, due to single-arm trials, hasn’t been explored as deeply as it needed to be.

“If you had to do a development plan over,” said Oncology Center of Excellence Director Richard Pazdur, “most people would agree that there should have been random studies done earlier.”

 

To view more CenterWatch Weekly stories, click here.

Upcoming Events

  • 12Apr

    The Patient Playbook Webinar Series, Part 3 — Rethinking the Development of Participant-Centric Clinical Trial Technology

  • 25Apr

    Effective Root Cause Analysis and CAPA Investigations for Drugs, Devices and Clinical Trials

  • 26Apr

    FDA’s New Laws and Regulations: What Drug and Biologics Manufacturers Need to Know

  • 27Apr

    Califf’s FDA, 2023 and Beyond: Key Developments, Insights and Analysis

  • 17May

    2023 WCG Avoca Quality Consortium Summit

  • 21May

    WCG MAGI Clinical Research Conference – 2023 East

Featured Products

  • Spreadsheet Validation: Tools and Techniques to Make Data in Excel Compliant

    Spreadsheet Validation: Tools and Techniques to Make Data in Excel Compliant

  • Surviving an FDA GCP Inspection

    Surviving an FDA GCP Inspection: Resources for Investigators, Sponsors, CROs and IRBs

Featured Stories

  • Five Ws

    Consider the Five ‘W’s to Understand Potential Participants

  • QandA-360x240.png

    Perspectives from Smaller-Sized CROs: Q&A with Cheryle Evans

  • White House

    Trial Stakeholders Advise White House on Emergency Research Infrastructure

  • SurveywBlueBackground-360x240.png

    Stress Levels Continue to Climb in Healthcare Workforce, Survey Finds

Standard Operating Procedures for Risk-Based Monitoring of Clinical Trials

The information you need to adapt your monitoring plan to changing times.

Learn More Here
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Do Not Sell or Share My Data

Footer Logo

300 N. Washington St., Suite 200, Falls Church, VA 22046, USA

Phone 617.948.5100 – Toll free 866.219.3440

Copyright © 2023. All Rights Reserved. Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing