• SKIP TO CONTENT
  • SKIP NAVIGATION
  • Patient Resources
    • COVID-19 Patient Resource Center
    • Clinical Trial Listings
    • What is Clinical Research?
    • Volunteering for a Clinical Trial
    • Understanding Informed Consent
    • Useful Resources
    • FDA Approved Drugs
  • Professional Resources
    • Research Center Profiles
    • Market Research
    • FDA Approved Drugs
    • Training Guides
    • Books
    • eLearning
    • Events
    • Newsletters
    • White Papers
    • SOPs
    • eCFR and Guidances
  • White Papers
  • Clinical Trial Listings
  • Advertise
  • COVID-19
  • Sign In
  • Create Account
  • Sign Out
  • My Account
Home » Five steps to a smooth IRT vendor transition

Five steps to a smooth IRT vendor transition

November 1, 2015
CenterWatch Staff

According to a 2015 market research report, the global clinical development outsourcing market will top $64 billion by 2020, with CROs managing nearly 72% of all clinical trials. As the outsourced model grows, sponsor-vendor relationships will play a much larger role in trial success.

Given this growing importance, sponsors must take proactive steps to monitor and enhance vendor relationships, and ensure smooth transitions between vendors when necessary. Interactive response technology (IRT/IVR/IWR) vendors can be challenging to transition, leaving some sponsors feeling it’s easier to simply accept a mediocre relationship. Accepting lower standards, however, can lead to missed deadlines, lost data and trials in crisis.

These steps will help sponsors transition before it’s too late:

  • Ensure your new IRT vendor can create an account management team with transition specialists. A team of experts with experience working both as vendors and sponsors can help maximize the impact of transitioning to a new vendor.
  • Develop appropriate governance, metrics and key performance indicators so the transition goes smoothly.
  • Alongside your vendor, build a roadmap outlining operational, study-specific and strategic needs. Instead of settling for a one-size-fits-all plan that can result in greater costs and delays, look for new vendors to provide custom solutions and reporting tools that meet your trial’s specific needs.
  • Once the blueprint is in place, avoid rebuilding your system from scratch and re-establishing standards. For example, to minimize backtracking, Cenduit utilizes a specification tool based on its own library so sponsors don’t need to conduct any additional User Acceptance Testing (UAT).
  • Confirm that your IRT vendor has the ability to adapt and integrate with multiple eClinical systems so data can move easily between software platforms.

These tips can simplify vendor transitions before a trial is in trouble, and allow sponsors to reap the benefits of improved IRT systems and vendor relationships—from system build through trial completion.

 

Written by Guest Writer Grant Dietrich. Dietrich has more than 12 years of experience in the pharmaceutical industry with expertise in IVR/IRT design management, clinical and supply chain management, project and program management including integration of clinical technologies, and pharmaceutical development. He has held various roles at Cenduit over the past seven years and currently serves as the account director to key clients and organizational initiatives, coordinating full collaboration between functional groups. He holds degrees from Rutgers, the University of Oklahoma and the U.S. Army Medical Department.

This article was reprinted from Volume 22, Issue 11, of The CenterWatch Monthly, an industry leading publication providing hard-hitting, authoritative business and financial coverage of the clinical research space. The Action Items section features short columns  focusing on actionable or how-to advice from clinical trial professionals. To submit an Action Item, please contact editorial@centerwatch.com. Subscribe >>

Upcoming Events

  • 12Apr

    The Participant Playbook Webinar Series, Part 3 — Rethinking the Development of Participant-Centric Clinical Trial Technology

  • 25Apr

    Effective Root Cause Analysis and CAPA Investigations for Drugs, Devices and Clinical Trials

  • 26Apr

    FDA’s New Laws and Regulations: What Drug and Biologics Manufacturers Need to Know

  • 27Apr

    Califf’s FDA, 2023 and Beyond: Key Developments, Insights and Analysis

  • 17May

    2023 WCG Avoca Quality Consortium Summit

  • 21May

    WCG MAGI Clinical Research Conference – 2023 East

Featured Products

  • Spreadsheet Validation: Tools and Techniques to Make Data in Excel Compliant

    Spreadsheet Validation: Tools and Techniques to Make Data in Excel Compliant

  • Surviving an FDA GCP Inspection

    Surviving an FDA GCP Inspection: Resources for Investigators, Sponsors, CROs and IRBs

Featured Stories

  • Five Ws

    Consider the Five ‘W’s to Understand Potential Participants

  • QandA-360x240.png

    Perspectives from Smaller-Sized CROs: Q&A with Cheryle Evans

  • White House

    Trial Stakeholders Advise White House on Emergency Research Infrastructure

  • SurveywBlueBackground-360x240.png

    Stress Levels Continue to Climb in Healthcare Workforce, Survey Finds

Standard Operating Procedures for Risk-Based Monitoring of Clinical Trials

The information you need to adapt your monitoring plan to changing times.

Learn More Here
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Do Not Sell or Share My Data

Footer Logo

300 N. Washington St., Suite 200, Falls Church, VA 22046, USA

Phone 617.948.5100 – Toll free 866.219.3440

Copyright © 2023. All Rights Reserved. Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing